Denver Broncos will generate interest in WR depth for trade

Jun 13, 2017; Englewood, CO, USA; Denver Broncos wide receiver Cody Latimer (14) and wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders (10) look on during minicamp at UCHealth Training Center. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports
Jun 13, 2017; Englewood, CO, USA; Denver Broncos wide receiver Cody Latimer (14) and wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders (10) look on during minicamp at UCHealth Training Center. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
1 of 4
Next

The Denver Broncos drafted two talented young receivers, and suddenly have an over-abundance at the position. Teams will come calling…

Jun 13, 2017; Englewood, CO, USA; Denver Broncos wide receiver Cody Latimer (14) and wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders (10) look on during minicamp at UCHealth Training Center. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports
Jun 13, 2017; Englewood, CO, USA; Denver Broncos wide receiver Cody Latimer (14) and wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders (10) look on during minicamp at UCHealth Training Center. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports /

The Denver Broncos head into their six-week break before training camp with a lot to think about. There is, of course, a quarterback battle going on with Paxton Lynch and Trevor Siemian. There’s also a new coaching staff (for the most part) and a very fluid situation along the offensive line.

With so much change happening already, what’s a little more?

Perhaps the deepest position on the Broncos’ roster right now is at wide receiver, and over the course of the next 10 weeks, that position will be their biggest bargaining chip in trade discussions as the team looks to address its depth at other key areas.

After last year’s debacle in Denver offensively, you might question whether or not this is actually a factual claim, but the Broncos have an over-abundance of talent at receiver and I want to take a look at some specific names that could be of interest to teams on the outside looking in.